本书选译了6篇与米兰达规则相关的论文，出版需要获得全部论文原文版权方的授权。译者在此过程中付出了大量的心血，如仍有未尽之处，请及时与译者或出版社沟通授权及其他相关事宜。现将本书所译论文及其版权声明按照本书的篇章顺序集中列明，作为对原文作者、出版机构及版权代理机构授权的感谢，也方便读者查阅。

第一章 90年代的警察审讯——米兰达规则影响的实证研究

Paul G. Cassell&Bret S. Hayman, “ Police Interrogation in the 1990s: An Empirical Study of the Effects of Miran-da”, 43 UCLA Law Review 839 (1996).

Reprinted with permission. Translated by Liu Fangquan with permission from Paul G. Cassell.

第二章 米兰达规则的社会成本:一个经验性重估

Paul G. Cassell, “Miranda's Social Costs: An Empirical Reassessment”, 90 Northwestern University Law Review, 387(1996).

Reprinted with permission. Translated by Liu Fangquan with permission from Paul G. Cassell.

第三章 铐上警察——米兰达规则对执法活动的消极影响之三十年回顾

Paul G. Cassell&Richard Fowles, “Handcuffing the Cops: A Thirty-Year Perspective on Miranda's Harmful Effects on Law Enforcement”, 50 Stanford Law Review 1055(1998).

Reprinted by permission.

第四章 “米兰达案”四十年:为何需要、如何达致——以及围绕着米兰达规则发生的一切

Yale Kamisar, “On the Fortieth Anniversary of the Miranda Case: Why We Needed It, How We Got It—And What Happened to It?” 5 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 163(2007).

Reprinted with permission. Translated by Liu Fangquan with permission from Yale Kamisar.

第五章 警察的手是不是还被铐着——米兰达规则妨碍警察执法效果的经验性证据之五十年回顾

Paul Cassell & Richard Fowles, “ Still Handcuffing the Cops? A Review of Fifty Years of Empirical Evidence of Miranda's Harmful Effects on Law Enforcement”, 97 Bost. U. L. Rev. 685 (2017).

Reprinted with permission. Translated by Liu Fangquan with permission from Yale Kamisar and Boston University Law Review.

第六章 米兰达规则削弱了警察的执法效果吗?

John J. Donohue III, “Did Miranda Diminish Police Effectiveness?”, 50 Stanford Law Review 1147(1998).

Reprinted by permission.